SIGFIDES
Trusted Signals for Real-World Identity
Tool Comparison

Sigfides vs Local Falcon — Measurement vs Identity Foundations

Local Falcon is a geo-grid measurement tool. It shows how you rank across a map for specific keywords. Sigfides operates one layer earlier — we verify that the identity, NAP, coordinates, schema and GBP being measured are actually correct, consistent and trusted by Google in the first place.

The core difference

Local Falcon answers: “Where do we rank across the map today?”
Sigfides asks: “Is Google fully confident about who you are and where you are — before we measure anything?”

If your identity signals are wrong, geo-grids don’t reveal a market problem — they reveal an identity problem.

In those situations, Local Falcon is faithfully mapping confusion. The grid is accurate — but the underlying reality is not.

Where Local Falcon is valuable

Local Falcon is extremely useful once your identity is stable:

In that context, it’s a powerful measurement and reporting instrument.

Why identity alignment must come before geo-grid measurement

Geo-grid tools can’t fix bad inputs. They only visualise the signals Google already sees. If your address, coordinates or NAP are wrong or unstable, you will never see the desired grid, no matter how often you run a Local Falcon scan.

In those cases, low or patchy grid results are not “Google being unfair” or “competitors beating you”. They are symptoms of low entity confidence.

Sigfides steps in before measurement to make sure the entity being measured is:

Once the identity is correct and consistent, Local Falcon grids finally reflect reality — not confusion.

How Sigfides and Local Falcon work best together

Local Falcon is a geo-visibility measurement layer.
Sigfides is an identity and proximity foundations layer.

Typical sequence for teams that care about accuracy:

After this sequence, grid improvements are not “luck” or “algorithm noise”. They are the visible result of Google gaining confidence in a precise, verified entity.